Data, declarations, preferences: the Odisage method
In front of a product, information of very different kinds arrives: measured numbers, manufacturer declarations, design choices, opinions, marketing messages. Mixing them leads to hasty conclusions, such as thinking that more power means more quality. This guide describes how Odisage tells six kinds of information apart, why it shows several parameters instead of just one and why it does not stop at a single number. It is the thread that ties the other guides together and the way product sheets and comparisons are built.
Six kinds of information
Almost every piece of data in a product sheet belongs to one of these kinds.
| Kind | What it is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | A quantity describable with a measurement | Weight in grams, grip diameter in millimetres |
| Manufacturer's declaration | A value stated by the maker, often without independent verification | Runtime, stroke, voltage range |
| Measurement | A value obtained by a test, with a known method | Weight read on a scale |
| Design characteristic | A construction choice | Architecture, motor type, attachment system |
| Personal preference | How a characteristic is experienced by whoever uses it | Grip comfort, feel at work |
| Marketing | A message designed to make a product preferred | "Power without compromise", "the professionals' choice" |
The same datum can change kind depending on how it is read. A machine's weight is a measurement if someone has taken it, a declaration if the manufacturer reports it. Telling them apart is not about distrusting everything: it is about knowing how much weight to give each piece of information.
Four shortcuts that lead astray
Some equivalences are widespread because they are simple, but they do not hold.
- Longer stroke = better machine? No. A different stroke changes behaviour, not the level of quality, and depends on the rest of the design.
- Greater runtime = better ergonomics? No. Runtime concerns energy; ergonomics depends on weight, balance and grip, and a bigger battery can also add weight.
- More power = more quality? No. Power is a quantity, not a judgement, and a more powerful motor says nothing about precision or durability.
- Lower weight = more comfort? Not automatically. Weight distribution, shape and grip diameter also count.
In all these cases a characteristic is mistaken for a consequence. The next step is to ask what the datum really says, and what it does not.
Why Odisage shows several parameters
A sheet with one number, or one score, invites a quick conclusion. A sheet with many parameters, organised in groups, invites a comparison. That is why Odisage shows technical specifications, states when a datum comes only from the manufacturer and leaves empty the fields it does not know, instead of filling them with estimates.
The Compare function exists for the same reason: it places several products side by side on the same parameters, so differences become visible. Comparison does not assign a winner: it shows where products diverge.
And the Odisage Score?
The Odisage Score is a summary indicator calculated with declared criteria (build quality, performance, reliability, ergonomics, value for money), starting from independent research and not from the manufacturer's specifications alone. It also reports the confidence level of the sources. It is a starting point, not a verdict: the Methodology page explains how it is made, which sources are considered and when a score is updated.
A method in four questions
In front of any piece of information about a product, four questions help place it.
- Who says so? The manufacturer, a measurement, a user, a promotional text.
- Under what conditions? With which configuration, with which battery, in which test.
- What does it not say? Which other quantities are needed to interpret it.
- How much depends on me? If it is a personal preference, no data can answer in my place.
Related terms: Stroke · Voltage · Runtime · Weight · Balance · Grip diameter · Materials
Related guides: How to read the specifications of a tattoo machine · How to compare two tattoo machines
You may also like
- Guide6 min readHow to read the specifications of a tattoo machineA datasheet looks like a list of numbers, but each number describes only one part of a machine that, when working, behaves as a whole. Stroke, weight, voltage or runtime say something precise, but none of them, alone, tells you what it will be like to use that machine. This guide proposes a way of reading specifications in groups, relating them to one another: what a datum really says, what depends on context and what is not reported at all. At the end you will find a small method to apply to every Odisage product sheet.
- Guide5 min readNeedles and cartridges: how to read codes and configurationsOn the box of a needle or cartridge there is a code of a few digits and letters that sums up gauge, number of points, configuration and often the taper too. Knowing how to read it makes it possible to compare products from different brands and to understand why two needles with the same code are not necessarily identical. This guide explains how the pieces of information combine, shows some examples and compares the main families of configurations from the point of view of shape. The definitions of individual terms are in the glossary: here the subject is how to read them together.
- Guide5 min readCoil, rotary and pen: comparing architecturesCoil, rotary and pen are the names used for the main families of tattoo machines, but they are not three categories on the same level: coil and rotary describe how the movement is produced, while pen mostly describes the shape. This guide compares structure, transmission, power, adjustments, ergonomics and maintenance, and retraces how the architectures have evolved. There is no winner: the aim is to understand how a machine's behaviour changes with how it is built, and why different artists may prefer different systems.
Stay one step ahead.
New tattoo gear comparisons, guidesand insights,straight to your inbox.

